RALEIGH,Benjamin Caldwell N.C. (AP) — A North Carolina judge properly used his discretion in declining to provide testimony transcripts to jurors deliberating in a murder trial, the state Supreme Court has ruled.
A majority of justices on Thursday overturned the state Court of Appeals’ order of a new trial for Tevin Demetrius Vann.
Vann was convicted in 2019 of first-degree murder in 2016 death of Ashley McLean, who was found dead inside a Wilmington hotel room. The jury also found Vann guilty of felony murder of McLean’s unborn child and robbery with a dangerous weapon. He was sentenced to life in prison without parole.
While Superior Court Judge Henry Stevens provided to jurors other trial-related documents, including a transcript of Vann’s interview with detectives, he declined to give them the opportunity to review trial testimony of Vann, a police detective and the medical examiner.
Stevens told jurors “it’s your duty to recall their testimony. So you will have to remember that. We’re not – we can’t provide a transcript as to that.”
A Court of Appeals panel determined in 2022 that Stevens’ decision was prejudicial error against Vann, particularly because his testimony differed from his earlier interrogation with police when he admitted to striking McLean and fleeing the hotel room with her cell phone. On the stand, he asserted he did not attack McLean and only previously confessed to avoid being charged with murder.
In Thursday’s opinion backed by five court members, Associate Justice Phil Berger wrote there was no prejudicial error because the case record showed the trial court “understood and properly exercised its discretion.” He cited in part how Stevens handled previous requests from the deliberating jurors.
Associate Justice Anita Earls wrote a dissenting opinion, saying a new trial was proper because it was clear Stevens believed he could not provide the transcripts of Vann’s testimony, which she said was crucial and central to the case.
In a separate opinion, Associate Justice Allison Riggs wrote that while Stevens erred on the request, it was wrong to order a new trial because there lacked a reasonable possibility that jurors would have reached a different result based on other evidence against Vann.
2025-05-01 10:441074 view
2025-05-01 10:421324 view
2025-05-01 10:312327 view
2025-05-01 09:342396 view
2025-05-01 08:152675 view
2025-05-01 08:052894 view
A private company aiming to build the first supersonic airliner since the Concorde retired more than
MILWAUKEE (AP) — The Rev. Al Sharpton is scheduled deliver a eulogy for a Black man who died last mo
The U.S. women are going to be sparkling in the City of Lights.USA Gymnastics and GK on Wednesday re